Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 138
Filter
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(5): 919-928, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20241735

ABSTRACT

Although Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence is high in the United States, standard-of-care (SOC) stool collection and testing practices might result in incidence overestimation or underestimation. We conducted diarrhea surveillance among inpatients >50 years of age in Louisville, Kentucky, USA, during October 14, 2019-October 13, 2020; concurrent SOC stool collection and CDI testing occurred independently. A study CDI case was nucleic acid amplification test‒/cytotoxicity neutralization assay‒positive or nucleic acid amplification test‒positive stool in a patient with pseudomembranous colitis. Study incidence was adjusted for hospitalization share and specimen collection rate and, in a sensitivity analysis, for diarrhea cases without study testing. SOC hospitalized CDI incidence was 121/100,000 population/year; study incidence was 154/100,000 population/year and, in sensitivity analysis, 202/100,000 population/year. Of 75 SOC CDI cases, 12 (16.0%) were not study diagnosed; of 109 study CDI cases, 44 (40.4%) were not SOC diagnosed. CDI incidence estimates based on SOC CDI testing are probably underestimated.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Adult , United States , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Kentucky/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Diagnostic Errors , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Specimen Handling
3.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(3): e38-e41, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273767
4.
Analyst ; 148(6): 1214-1220, 2023 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288540

ABSTRACT

Timely and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is critical for controlling the pandemic. As the standard method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has good convenience. However, RT-qPCR still has a relatively high false-negative rate, particularly in the case of detecting low viral loads. In this study, using selenium-modified nucleoside triphosphates (dNTPαSe) in the RT-PCR reactions, we successfully increased the detection sensitivity and reduced the false-negative rate in COVID-19 diagnosis. By detecting positive controls, pseudovirus, and clinical samples with the commercial kits, we found that the dNTPαSe supplementation to these kits could generally offer smaller Ct values, permit the viral detection even in single-digit copies, and increase the detection specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy, thereby reducing the false-negative rate. Our experimental results demonstrated that dNTPαSe supplementation can make the commercial kits more specific, sensitive, and accurate, and this method is a convenient and efficient strategy for the disease detection and diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19 Testing , Diagnostic Errors , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Dietary Supplements , RNA, Viral
5.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(3): 681-683, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287530

ABSTRACT

Tension pneumothorax is a condition that can present with a myriad of symptoms, including chest pain, shortness of breath, rapid breathing, and tachycardia. If left untreated, these signs and symptoms can progress to shock causing haemodynamic collapse and even death. At times, it may be difficult to identify tension pneumothorax. We present the case of a 59-year-old male with a prolonged initial hospital course that eventually led to a diagnosis of tension pneumothorax with the use of CT scans rather than traditional X-rays. This case reinforces the idea that clinicians should have a wide differential diagnosis in mind when dealing with vague symptoms and should not hesitate to use different diagnostic modalities to help confirm a diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intestinal Volvulus , Pneumothorax , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/etiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Intestinal Volvulus/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Diagnostic Errors/adverse effects
6.
Kardiologiia ; 62(12): 80-84, 2022 Dec 31.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260289

ABSTRACT

A 37-year-old female patient was admitted 16 days after delivery in a hospital for infectious diseases with cough, shortness of breath, and infiltrative changes in the lungs that were interpreted as viral pneumonia. Considering the failure of therapy and the history, peripartum cardiomyopathy was suspected. Examination revealed a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to 30 %, ultrasonic signs of lung congestion and bilateral hydrothorax. The patient was diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy accompanied by functional class 4 heart failure. A specific feature of this case was fast positive dynamics with complete regression of the clinical picture of congestion and improvement of the left ventricular myocardial function associated with the treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiomyopathies , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Puerperal Disorders , Female , Humans , Adult , Pregnancy , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Peripartum Period , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/etiology , Lung , Diagnostic Errors , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy
7.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 42(6): e201-e203, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282444

ABSTRACT

Working in the era of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 can predispose to cognitive bias. We present a case of life-threatening bacterial infection misdiagnosed as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. While multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children-related myocardial dysfunction is now a well-recognized complication of coronavirus disease 2019, a rigorous differential diagnosis approach, notably for infectious etiologies, is paramount.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(8): 1902-1910, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required clinicians to care for a disease with evolving characteristics while also adhering to care changes (e.g., physical distancing practices) that might lead to diagnostic errors (DEs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of DEs and their causes among patients hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Eight medical centers affiliated with the Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network (HOMERuN). TARGET POPULATION: Adults hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19 infection between February and July 2020. MEASUREMENTS: We randomly selected up to 8 cases per site per month for review, with each case reviewed by two clinicians to determine whether a DE (defined as a missed or delayed diagnosis) occurred, and whether any diagnostic process faults took place. We used bivariable statistics to compare patients with and without DE and multivariable models to determine which process faults or patient factors were associated with DEs. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patient charts underwent review, of which 36 (14%) had a diagnostic error. Patients with and without DE were statistically similar in terms of socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, risk factors for COVID-19, and COVID-19 test turnaround time and eventual positivity. Most common diagnostic process faults contributing to DE were problems with clinical assessment, testing choices, history taking, and physical examination (all p < 0.01). Diagnostic process faults associated with policies and procedures related to COVID-19 were not associated with DE risk. Fourteen patients (35.9% of patients with errors and 5.4% overall) suffered harm or death due to diagnostic error. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited by available documentation and do not capture communication between providers and patients. CONCLUSION: Among PUI patients, DEs were common and not associated with pandemic-related care changes, suggesting the importance of more general diagnostic process gaps in error propagation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Prevalence , Diagnostic Errors , COVID-19 Testing
9.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 59(4): 667-672, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238853

ABSTRACT

AIMS: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) maintains its importance in the differential diagnosis of common febrile diseases. MIS-C should be promptly diagnosed because corticosteroid and/or intravenous immunoglobulin treatment can prevent severe clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate clinical presentation, diagnostic parameters and management of MIS-C and compare its clinical features to those of common febrile disease. METHODS: This study was conducted at a tertiary-level university hospital between December 2020 and October 2022. One hundred and six children who were initially considered to have MIS-C disease were included in the study. During the follow-up period in the hospital, when the clinical and laboratory findings were re-evaluated, 38 out of 106 children were diagnosed differently. The clinical and laboratory findings of 68 children followed up with the diagnosis of MIS-C and 38 children who were initially misdiagnosed as MIS-C but with different final diagnoses were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: We identified 68 patients with MIS-C and 38 patients misdiagnosed as MIS-C during the study period. Infectious causes (71%), predominantly bacterial origin, were the most frequently confused conditions with MIS-C. Patients with MIS-C were older and had a more severe clinical course with high rates of respiratory distress, shock, and paediatric intensive care unit admission. While rash and conjunctivitis were more common among patients with MIS-C, cough, abdominal pain and diarrhoea were observed more frequently in patients misdiagnosed as MIS-C. Lower absolute lymphocyte counts, platelet counts and higher C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels, pathological findings on echocardiography were the distinctive laboratory parameters for MIS-C. Multivariate analysis showed that older age, presence of conjunctivitis, high level of serum CRP and lower platelets were the most discriminative predictors for the diagnosis of MIS-C. CONCLUSION: There are still no specific findings to diagnose MIS-C, which therefore can be confused with different clinical conditions. Further data are needed to assist the clinician in the differential diagnosis of MIS-C and the diagnostic criteria should be updated over time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis , Child , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Confusion , Diagnostic Errors , COVID-19 Testing
10.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 27, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227668

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) is a pathology with a high rate of diagnostic error. The search for new diagnostic tools is justified by the high morbidity and healthcare costs associated with diagnostic error. METHODS: We designed a prospective study to validate serum pentraxin-3 (PTX3) as a diagnostic tool in PAA. Participants were divided into three groups: (1) patients with no underlying pathology (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA. For further analyses, patients in group 3 were divided into complicated or uncomplicated PAA. Quantitative variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges and categorical variables as percentages. Quantitative variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with ROC curves. RESULTS: This study included 215 patients divided into group 1 (n = 63), group 2 (n = 53) and group 3 (n = 99). Median serum PTX3 values were 2.54 (1.70-2.95) ng/mL, 3.29 (2.19-7.64) ng/mL and 8.94 (6.16-14.05) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.001). Patients with complicated PAA showed significantly higher values than patients with uncomplicated PAA (p = 0.04). The AUC (group 2 vs. 3) was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.85) and the best cut-off point was at 7.28 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 73.1%. The AUC (complicated vs. uncomplicated PAA) was 0.65 (95% CI 0.54-0.77) and the best cut-off point was 12.33 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 51.72% and a specificity of 72.73%. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic ability of serum PTX3 in PAA is only moderate and therefore it cannot be considered a definitive diagnostic test. The discriminatory ability of PTX3 between complicated and uncomplicated PAA is poor. These findings, which contrast with those reported to date, should be validated with future properly designed prospective studies.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Abdominal Pain , Diagnostic Errors
12.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 7(1): e24220, 2021 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2141289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction using nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the most widely used diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, false negatives and the sensitivity of this mode of testing have posed challenges in the accurate estimation of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether technical and, therefore, correctable errors were being made with regard to nasopharyngeal swab procedures. METHODS: We searched a web-based video database (YouTube) for videos demonstrating SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab tests, posted from January 1 to May 15, 2020. Videos were rated by 3 blinded rhinologists for accuracy of swab angle and depth. The overall score for swab angle and swab depth for each nasopharyngeal swab demonstration video was determined based on the majority score with agreement between at least 2 of the 3 reviewers. We then comparatively evaluated video data collected from YouTube videos demonstrating the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique with data from videos demonstrating an incorrect nasopharyngeal swab technique. Multiple linear regression analysis with statistical significance set at P=.05 was performed to determine video data variables associated with the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique. RESULTS: In all, 126 videos met the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 52.3% (66/126) of all videos demonstrated the correct swab angle, and 46% (58/126) of the videos demonstrated an appropriate swab depth. Moreover, 45.2% (57/126) of the videos demonstrated both correct nasopharyngeal swab angle and appropriate depth, whereas 46.8% (59/126) of the videos demonstrated both incorrect nasopharyngeal swab angle and inappropriate depth. Videos with correct nasopharyngeal swab technique were associated with the swab operators identifying themselves as a medical professional or as an Ear, Nose, Throat-related medical professional. We also found an association between correct nasopharyngeal swab techniques and recency of video publication date (relative to May 15, 2020). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that over half of the videos documenting the nasopharyngeal swab test showed an incorrect technique, which could elevate false-negative test rates. Therefore, greater attention needs to be provided toward educating frontline health care workers who routinely perform nasopharyngeal swab procedures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , Nasopharynx/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Social Media , Specimen Handling/methods , Video Recording , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
13.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina ; 53(9): 518-521, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2040029

ABSTRACT

We report a case of bilateral optic nerve head drusen complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the left eye at presentation. The presence of optic disc and macular edema in addition to exudation led to the misdiagnosis of neuroretinitis at an outside medical center. Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and SSOCT angiography were critical in establishing the diagnosis and follow-up in a noninvasive manner. Secondary CNV associated with optic nerve head drusen responded well to intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in the left eye. Asymptomatic nonexudative CNV that developed in the right eye during follow-up regressed spontaneously without treatment. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:518-521.].


Subject(s)
Chorioretinitis , Choroidal Neovascularization , Optic Disk Drusen , Optic Disk , Papilledema , Retinitis , Chorioretinitis/complications , Choroidal Neovascularization/diagnosis , Choroidal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Choroidal Neovascularization/etiology , Diagnostic Errors/adverse effects , Endothelial Growth Factors , Humans , Optic Disk Drusen/complications , Optic Disk Drusen/diagnosis , Papilledema/complications , Papilledema/etiology , Retinitis/complications
16.
Eur J Med Res ; 27(1): 84, 2022 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the last 2 years, in the Kurdistan Region, Northern Iraq, there were thousands of COVID-19 cases that have not been reported officially, but diagnosed and confirmed by private laboratories and private hospitals, or clinicians based on typical clinical signs, as well as few people using home self-test after appearing of some flu-like clinical symptoms. Thus, this study aims to assess the misdiagnosis and mismanagement of cases before COVID-19 confirmation. METHODS: This study enrolled 100 consecutive patients who visited an outpatient clinic of Shar Hospital that had symptoms highly suspicious of COVID-19 infection while misdiagnosed previously to have other types of disease. Detailed questionnaires were filled for all studied patients, including age, gender, main presenting symptoms, and duration of these symptoms with the following questions: who made the false diagnosis, depending on which diagnostic test the false diagnosis was made, which medication was used for the false diagnosis, who prescribed those medications, and how long those medications were used. They were investigated by RT-PCR on their nasopharyngeal swab for confirmation. RESULTS: Most of the false diagnoses were typhoid (63%), influenza (14%), pneumonia (9%), gastroenteritis (5%), common cold (4%), brucellosis (4%), and meningitis (1%). Regarding the false diagnosis of cases, 92% were made by non-physician healthcare workers, and only 8% were made by physicians. All false diagnoses with typhoid, gastroenteritis, and common cold were made by non-physician healthcare workers, together with about half of the diagnosis of pneumonia and brucellosis, with statistically significant results (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We realized that some patients had been misdiagnosed before the COVID-19 infection confirmation. Their health conditions improved drastically after correct diagnosis and treatment, and this research is considered the first research to be conducted in Iraq in this regard.


Subject(s)
Brucellosis , COVID-19 , Common Cold , Gastroenteritis , Typhoid Fever , COVID-19/diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors , Humans , Iraq/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
18.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(2): 199-206, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1917038

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To use a case review approach for investigating the types of cognitive error identifiable following a complicated patient admission with a multisystem disorder in an acute care setting where diagnosis was difficult and delayed. METHODS: A case notes review was undertaken to explore the cognitive factors associated with diagnostic error in the case of an 18-year-old male presenting acutely unwell with myalgia, anorexia and vomiting. Each clinical interaction was analysed and identified cognitive factors were categorised using a framework developed by Graber et al. RESULTS: Cognitive factors resulting in diagnostic errors most frequently occurred within the first five days of hospital admission. The most common were premature closure; failure to order or follow up an appropriate test; over-reliance on someone else's findings or opinion; over-estimating or underestimating usefulness or salience of a finding, and; ineffective, incomplete or faulty history and physical examination. Cognitive factors were particularly frequent around transitions of care and patient transfers from one clinical area to another. The presence of senior staff did not necessarily mitigate against diagnostic error from cognitive factors demonstrated by junior staff or diagnostic errors made out-of-hours. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive factors are a significant cause of diagnostic error within the first five days after admission, especially around transitions of care between different clinical settings and providers. Medical education interventions need to ensure clinical reasoning training supports individuals and teams to develop effective strategies for mitigating cognitive factors when faced with uncertainty over complex patients presenting with non-specific symptoms in order to reduce diagnostic error.


Subject(s)
Clinical Reasoning , Cognition , Adolescent , Diagnostic Errors , Humans , Male
19.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(2): 294-386, 2022 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1917039
20.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt A): 131-135, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1899505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tertiary surveys can help identify missed injuries, but how and when to conduct them remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a policy requiring tertiary survey completion within 24 h post-admission. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed with a pre-intervention time-period of 8/1/2019-1/31/2020, where tertiary surveys were performed prior to discharge (n = 762). During the post-intervention time-period of 8/1/2020-1/31/21 tertiary surveys were performed within 24 h of admission (n = 651). RESULTS: Missed injury (1.6% [n = 12] vs. 1.5% [n = 10]; p = 0.953) and mortality rates (3.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.579) were similar between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Tertiary survey completion rates were higher (86.8% vs. 80.2%; p = 0.001) and exams performed earlier (1[1-1] vs. 1 [1-2] day, p < 0.001) in the post-intervention group. For those with missed injuries, time to injury identification and number of injuries identified on tertiary survey was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Requiring tertiary surveys within 24 h of admission can help identify and correct missed injuries, but standardization of the tertiary survey process and documentation may be as important as the timing.


Subject(s)
Multiple Trauma , Trauma Centers , Diagnostic Errors , Documentation , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL